Detailed guide
Evidence · Alternatives · Impact Scores
Embedded Files
Every company here has documented political spending, lobbying activity, or government contracting that gives it outsized influence over the policies this project opposes. Each entry includes the evidence, the alternatives, and an impact score showing where your spending has the most leverage. You don't need to act on all of them. Pick one. Redirect that spending. Log it.
🛑 CONSUMER PRODUCT BOYCOTT GUIDE
FULL MASTER LIST – Ranked by Consumer‑Facing Impact & Pressure Leverage
This document is an advocacy and informational resource intended to help individuals and organizations understand where consumer boycotts may exert leverage over corporate political behavior. It does not allege criminal activity, legal violations, or intent by any company listed.
All entities included are corporations or corporate groups, not individual workers, customers, or private citizens.
Impact scores represent analytical judgments derived from publicly available data and are intended to evaluate potential consumer leverage, not to assert wrongdoing.
🛒 AMAZON (AWS)
Parent company: Amazon.com, Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Amazon, Amazon Basics, Whole Foods, Zappos, Audible, Twitch, Ring, IMDb, AWS
Avoid products/services: Amazon retail & Prime, Whole Foods, Ring devices, Twitch, AWS (where influence applies)
Evidence:
• AWS cloud services are extensively used by U.S. government agencies (defense, intelligence, enforcement), forming part of surveillance infrastructure.
• Amazon has consistently spent tens of millions on federal lobbying and PAC contributions.
• Amazon and other Big Tech have been flagged in watchdog reports for political influence over policy and regulators.
Refs: OpenSecrets; USAspending.gov; Public Citizen reporting
Alternatives: Local retailers, co‑ops, Bookshop.org, independent grocers
Impact score: Consumer Reach 5 | Revenue Sensitivity 5 | Political Leverage 5
🏬 WALMART
Parent company: Walmart Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Walmart, Sam’s Club
Avoid products/services: Walmart (in‑store & online), Sam’s Club
Evidence:
• Walmart is documented as a significant political donor with PAC contributions to major party leadership.
• Corporate lobbying has opposed wage increases and labor protections at the state and federal levels.
• Watchdog analyses include Walmart among large corporate contributors to political influence networks.
Refs: OpenSecrets; ProPublica
Alternatives: Local grocers, food co‑ops, Aldi
Impact score: Consumer Reach 5 | Revenue Sensitivity 5 | Political Leverage 4
🔍 GOOGLE (Alphabet)
Parent company: Alphabet Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Google Search, YouTube, Gmail, Android, Google Maps
Avoid products/services: Google Search, YouTube, Gmail (where feasible)
Evidence:
• Alphabet (Google) regularly ranks among top corporate federal lobby spenders.
• Google products and data pipelines are ubiquitously integrated with government surveillance or information infrastructure concerns.
• Major news outlets report tech lobbying influence affecting regulation debates, including privacy and AI policy.
Refs: OpenSecrets; Harvard Corporate Governance commentary; Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility
Alternatives: DuckDuckGo, ProtonMail, OpenStreetMap
Impact score: Consumer Reach 5 | Revenue Sensitivity 4 | Political Leverage 5
🪟 MICROSOFT
Parent company: Microsoft Corporation
Subsidiaries / Brands: Windows, Office, Azure, LinkedIn, GitHub, Xbox
Avoid products/services: Microsoft Office, Windows licensing (where feasible), Azure services
Evidence:
· Microsoft holds massive federal contracts across defense, intelligence, and enforcement tech, including cloud services.
· Electronic lobbying disclosures show millions spent on federal political influence and PAC contributions.
· Identified among top government contractors with significant contract revenues tied to public agencies.
Refs: OpenSecrets; Public Citizen; USAspending.gov
Alternatives: LibreOffice, Linux-based systems, smaller cloud providers
Impact score: Consumer Reach 5 | Revenue Sensitivity 4 | Political Leverage 5
🚀 ELON MUSK COMPANIES (X, Tesla, SpaceX / Starlink)
Parent company: Various privately and publicly held entities
Subsidiaries / Brands: X, Tesla, SpaceX, Starlink
Avoid products/services: X Premium, Tesla vehicles, Starlink services
Evidence:
• Musk‑led companies have been among top corporate donors or influencers in major political fundraising contexts.
• SpaceX and Starlink have received government contracts in space and defense sectors.
• X (formerly Twitter) has been part of debates on political content moderation and platform regulation.
Refs: OpenSecrets; SEC filings; USAspending.gov
Alternatives: Public transit, alternative EV makers, non-Musk social platforms
Impact score: Consumer Reach 5 | Revenue Sensitivity 4 | Political Leverage 5
📱 META (Facebook / Instagram / WhatsApp)
Parent company: Meta Platforms, Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Threads, Oculus / Meta Quest
Avoid products/services: Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp
Evidence:
• Meta Platforms regularly ranks among the largest tech corporate lobby spenders.
• Independent reports highlight Meta’s platforms as key conduits for political messaging and amplification.
• Meta’s political ad infrastructure and corporate contributions are substantial in shaping regulatory environments.
Refs: OpenSecrets; Congressional testimony; tech watchdog reporting
Alternatives: Signal, Mastodon, Bluesky, Pixelfed
Impact score: Consumer Reach 5 | Revenue Sensitivity 4 | Political Leverage 4
💳 VISA
Parent company: Visa Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Visa Credit, Visa Debit
Avoid products/services: Visa cards
Evidence:
• Visa Inc. has a large corporate PAC with documented political contributions.
• Financial services industry lobbying is a major force opposing certain consumer financial regulations.
• Contributions have supported candidates across party lines in legislative debates on regulation
Refs: OpenSecrets; FEC
Alternatives: Credit unions, Discover
Impact score: Consumer Reach 5 | Revenue Sensitivity 4 | Political Leverage 4
📞 AT&T
Parent company: AT&T Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: AT&T Wireless, Fiber, Cricket Wireless
Avoid products/services: AT&T, Cricket
Evidence:
• AT&T’s corporate PAC is frequently among top contributors in federal campaign finance rankings.
• AT&T has federal contracts with government agencies including ICE and enforcement communication services.
• Longstanding lobbying on telecom deregulation and surveillance policy is well‑documented.
Refs: OpenSecrets; FEC; USAspending.gov contract reporting; political reporting
Alternatives: Consumer Cellular, Ting
Impact score: Consumer Reach 5 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 5
📡 VERIZON
Parent company: Verizon Communications Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Verizon Wireless, Fios
Avoid products/services: Verizon services
Evidence:
• Verizon has a significant political action committee reflected in federal contributions data
• Corporate lobbying data shows engagement on privacy and telecom policy at high levels.
• Infrastructure contracts include law enforcement communication chains and government service integration.
Refs: OpenSecrets; USAspending.gov; FEC PAC data; Harvard corporate lobbying list
Alternatives: Mint Mobile, Ting
Impact score: Consumer Reach 5 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 4
🛢️ EXXONMOBIL
Parent company: Exxon Mobil Corporation
Subsidiaries / Brands: Exxon, Mobil
Avoid products/services: Exxon and Mobil branded fuel
Evidence:
• ExxonMobil is documented industry‑wide as a significant fossil fuel lobby and political actor.
• Federal lobbying and PAC contributions are consistently reported in OpenSecrets and corporate disclosures.
• While direct enforcement contracts are less visible, energy policy influence is a major political lever.
Refs: OpenSecrets; FEC
Alternatives: Reduced fuel use, EV charging, transit
Impact score: Consumer Reach 4 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 5
🛢️ CHEVRON
Parent company: Chevron Corporation
Subsidiaries / Brands: Chevron, Texaco
Avoid products/services: Chevron branded fuel
Evidence:
• Chevron’s lobbying expenditures and political contributions are documented in corporate reports.
• Fossil fuel sector political activity is widely tracked as influencing climate and energy policy.
• Chevron appears in watchdog analyses of corporate political influence networks.
Refs: OpenSecrets; FEC
Alternatives: Reduced fuel use, EV charging, transit
Impact score: Consumer Reach 4 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 5
🏦 JPMORGAN CHASE
Parent company: JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Chase Bank, Chase Credit Cards
Avoid products/services: Chase banking & credit cards
Evidence:
• JPMorgan Chase is among the largest corporate PAC contributors in finance.
• The company participates in significant federal policy influence via lobbying and sector coalitions.
• Known as a leading financier of fossil fuel and defense sectors with leverage in regulatory debates.
Refs: OpenSecrets; Banking on Climate Chaos
Alternatives: Credit unions, community banks
Impact score: Consumer Reach 4 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 5
🗄️ ORACLE
Parent company: Oracle Corporation
Subsidiaries / Brands: Oracle Cloud, NetSuite, Cerner
Avoid products/services: Oracle enterprise software
Evidence:
Executive Trump support
Government data infrastructure dominance
Refs: OpenSecrets; investigative reporting
Alternatives: Open‑source or smaller enterprise vendors
Impact score: Consumer Reach 2 | Revenue Sensitivity 2 | Political Leverage 4
📺 COMCAST (Xfinity / NBCUniversal)
Parent company: Comcast Corporation
Subsidiaries / Brands: Xfinity, NBC, MSNBC, Peacock, Universal Pictures
Avoid products/services: Xfinity, Peacock
Evidence:
GOP‑aligned PAC donations
Telecom deregulation lobbying
Opposition to net‑neutrality rules
Refs: OpenSecrets; FEC
Alternatives: Municipal broadband, independent ISPs
Impact score: Consumer Reach 4 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 4
📡 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS (Spectrum)
Parent company: Charter Communications, Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Spectrum Internet, TV, Mobile
Avoid products/services: Spectrum services
Evidence:
Heavy GOP PAC donations
Net‑neutrality opposition
Refs: OpenSecrets; FCC filings
Alternatives: Local ISPs, municipal broadband
Impact score: Consumer Reach 4 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 4
🚗 TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NA
Parent company: Toyota Motor Corporation
Subsidiaries / Brands: Toyota, Lexus
Avoid products/services: Toyota vehicles
Evidence:
Toyota's PAC donated more than any other corporate PAC to lawmakers who voted against certifying the 2020 election results, before public pressure forced a policy reversal
Refs: OpenSecrets
Alternatives: Other automakers, transit, reduced car use
Impact score: Consumer Reach 4 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 4
💻 DELL
Parent company: Dell Technologies
Subsidiaries / Brands: Dell, Dell Federal Systems
Avoid products/services: Dell consumer and enterprise hardware
Evidence:
Federal and defense contracting
Government IT infrastructure dependency
Refs: USAspending.gov
Alternatives: Smaller hardware vendors, refurbished systems
Impact score: Consumer Reach 4 | Revenue Sensitivity 4 | Political Leverage 3
📰 RUPERT MURDOCH MEDIA (Fox Corp, News Corp)
Parent company: Fox Corporation / News Corporation
Subsidiaries / Brands: Fox News, Wall Street Journal, New York Post
Avoid products/services: Fox media platforms
Evidence:
• Agenda-setting influence on U.S. political discourse
Refs: SEC filings; media watchdog reporting
Alternatives: Independent journalism outlets
Impact score: Consumer Reach 4 | Revenue Sensitivity 2 | Political Leverage 5
🏬 HOME DEPOT
Parent company: The Home Depot, Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Home Depot
Avoid products/services: Home Depot purchases
Evidence:
Founder and executive Trump funding
Refs: FEC; ProPublica
Alternatives: Local hardware stores, tool libraries
Impact score: Consumer Reach 4 | Revenue Sensitivity 4 | Political Leverage 2
🛠️ LOWE’S
Parent company: Lowe’s Companies, Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Lowe’s
Avoid products/services: Lowe’s retail
Evidence:
GOP‑aligned executive donations
Refs: OpenSecrets
Alternatives: Local hardware stores
Impact score: Consumer Reach 4 | Revenue Sensitivity 4 | Political Leverage 2
🎯 TARGET
Parent company: Target Corporation
Subsidiaries / Brands: Not applicable (single‑brand retailer)
Avoid products/services: Target retail
Evidence:
PAC donations contradict DEI branding
Refs: OpenSecrets
Alternatives: Local retailers
Impact score: Consumer Reach 4 | Revenue Sensitivity 4 | Political Leverage 2
📺 PARAMOUNT GLOBAL (CBS / Paramount+)
Parent company: Paramount Global
Subsidiaries / Brands: CBS, Paramount+, Showtime, BET, MTV, Nickelodeon, Comedy Central, VH1
Avoid products/services: Paramount+, CBS-owned streaming and cable properties, Paramount theatrical releases (where feasible)
Evidence:
• Major national media conglomerate with agenda-setting influence
• Corporate PAC participation and federal lobbying
• News and entertainment platforms shape public discourse and normalization
Refs: SEC filings; OpenSecrets; media ownership records
Alternatives: Independent streaming platforms, public broadcasting, creator-owned media
Impact score: Consumer Reach 4 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 3
🧻 KOCH INDUSTRIES (Georgia‑Pacific Brands)
Parent company: Koch Industries
Subsidiaries / Brands: Georgia‑Pacific, Dixie, Brawny, Angel Soft, Quilted Northern
Avoid products/services: Koch household paper goods
Evidence:
Central funder of right‑wing and Project 2025 infrastructure
Refs: OpenSecrets; investigative reporting
Alternatives: Seventh Generation, Marcal
Impact score: Consumer Reach 2 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 5
📦 ULINE
Parent company: Privately held
Subsidiaries / Brands: Not publicly disclosed
Avoid products/services: Uline supplies
Evidence:
Owners are among largest MAGA donors
Refs: OpenSecrets; FEC
Alternatives: Local suppliers
Impact score: Consumer Reach 2 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 5
📰 THOMSON REUTERS (TRSS)
Parent company: Thomson Reuters Corporation
Subsidiaries / Brands: Reuters, Westlaw
Avoid products/services: Corporate legal research platforms
Evidence:
• Government and law enforcement information infrastructure
Refs: SEC filings
Alternatives: Independent legal research platforms
Impact score: Consumer Reach 3 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 4
📡 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS
Parent company: Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Public safety communications systems
Avoid products/services: Not applicable (institutional services)
Evidence:
• Law enforcement communications contracts
Refs: USAspending.gov
Impact score: Consumer Reach 3 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 4
🚚 FEDEX
Parent company: FedEx Corporation
Subsidiaries / Brands: FedEx Express, Ground
Avoid products/services: FedEx shipping
Evidence:
Federal logistics and enforcement contracts
Refs: USAspending.gov
Alternatives: USPS, regional carriers
Impact score: Consumer Reach 3 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 3
🍔 CHICK‑FIL‑A
Parent company: Privately held
Subsidiaries / Brands: Chick‑fil‑A
Avoid products/services: Chick‑fil‑A restaurants
Evidence:
The WinShape Foundation, Chick-fil-A's charitable arm, donated millions to organizations opposing LGBTQ+ rights including the Family Research Council and Fellowship of Christian Athletes through 2019. The company's founder and chairman Dan Cathy has continued to personally fund and associate with anti-LGBTQ+ causes
Refs: IRS filings; investigative reporting
Alternatives: Local restaurants
Impact score: Consumer Reach 3 | Revenue Sensitivity 4 | Political Leverage 2
🏨 HILTON HOTELS
Parent company: Hilton Worldwide Holdings
Subsidiaries / Brands: Hilton, Hampton, DoubleTree
Avoid products/services: Hilton‑branded hotels
Evidence:
GOP‑aligned PAC activity
Refs: OpenSecrets
Alternatives: Unionized or independent hotels
Impact score: Consumer Reach 3 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 3
🚗 ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS
Parent company: Enterprise Holdings
Subsidiaries / Brands: Enterprise, National, Alamo
Avoid products/services: Enterprise rentals
Evidence:
Trump‑aligned donor family
Refs: OpenSecrets; ProPublica
Alternatives: Local rentals, transit
Impact score: Consumer Reach 3 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 3
🏨 HYATT
Parent company: Hyatt Hotels Corporation
Subsidiaries / Brands: Hyatt Regency, Grand Hyatt, Park Hyatt, Andaz, Hyatt Place, Hyatt House, Alila, Thompson Hotels
Avoid products/services: Hyatt-branded hotels and loyalty programs
Evidence:
• Corporate PAC activity and hospitality-sector lobbying
• Government, conference, and institutional travel contracts
• Industry alignment with broader corporate policy coalitions
Refs: OpenSecrets; SEC filings
Alternatives: Independent hotels, locally owned accommodations, cooperative lodging
Impact score: Consumer Reach 3 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 3
🏨 BEST WESTERN INTERNATIONAL
Parent company: Best Western Hotels & Resorts
Avoid products/services: Best Western hotels
Evidence:
• Industry PAC participation
Refs: OpenSecrets
Impact score: Consumer Reach 3 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 2
🛢️ VALERO ENERGY
Parent company: Valero Energy Corporation
Subsidiaries / Brands: Valero, Diamond Shamrock
Avoid products/services: Valero‑branded fuel
Evidence:
Fossil‑fuel PAC funding GOP climate obstruction
Refs: OpenSecrets; FEC
Alternatives: Reduced fuel use, EV charging, transit
Impact score: Consumer Reach 2 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 4
🏦 BLACKROCK
Parent company: BlackRock, Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: iShares, BlackRock Asset Management
Avoid products/services: BlackRock‑managed funds
Evidence:
Structural influence over energy, defense, and policing sectors
Refs: SEC filings; OpenSecrets
Alternatives: Community‑based funds, ESG‑screened funds
Impact score: Consumer Reach 2 | Revenue Sensitivity 2 | Political Leverage 5
🥤 SMOOTHIE KING
Parent company: Privately held
Subsidiaries / Brands: Not publicly disclosed
Avoid products/services: Smoothie King
Evidence:
Executive political donations
Refs: OpenSecrets
Alternatives: Local smoothie shops, independent cafés
Impact score: Consumer Reach 2 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 2
🛏️ MYPILLOW
Parent company: Privately held
Avoid products/services: MyPillow products
Evidence:
• Executive political funding
Refs: FEC
Impact score: Consumer Reach 2 | Revenue Sensitivity 1 | Political Leverage 4
🧑💼 KELLY SERVICES
Parent company: Kelly Services, Inc.
Avoid products/services: Staffing services
Evidence:
• Government contracting
Refs: USAspending.gov
Impact score: Consumer Reach 2 | Revenue Sensitivity 2 | Political Leverage 2
🖨️ LEXMARK
Parent company: Lexmark International
Avoid products/services: Lexmark printers
Evidence:
• Enterprise and government contracts
Refs: SEC filings
Impact score: Consumer Reach 2 | Revenue Sensitivity 2 | Political Leverage 2
🛡️ GENERAL DYNAMICS
Parent company: General Dynamics Corporation
Avoid products/services: Not applicable (defense contractor)
Evidence:
• Major defense lobbying and contracts
Refs: USAspending.gov
Impact score: Consumer Reach 3 | Revenue Sensitivity 3 | Political Leverage 5
🧠 PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES
Parent company: Palantir Technologies Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Gotham, Foundry, Apollo
Avoid products/services: Not applicable (primarily government / B2B services)
Evidence:
ICE and surveillance infrastructure
Refs: ACLU; USAspending.gov
Alternatives: Not applicable (institutional service)
Impact score: Consumer Reach 1 | Revenue Sensitivity 1 | Political Leverage 5
🏢 CORECIVIC
Parent company: CoreCivic, Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Not publicly disclosed
Avoid products/services: Private prison services
Evidence:
ICE detention contracts
Refs: DOJ; OpenSecrets
Alternatives: Not applicable (no consumer substitute)
Impact score: Consumer Reach 1 | Revenue Sensitivity 1 | Political Leverage 5
🏢 GEO GROUP
Parent company: GEO Group, Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Not publicly disclosed
Avoid products/services: Private detention services
Evidence:
ICE detention contracts
Refs: DOJ; OpenSecrets
Alternatives: Not applicable (no consumer substitute)
Impact score: Consumer Reach 1 | Revenue Sensitivity 1 | Political Leverage 5
🧾 BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON
Parent company: Booz Allen Hamilton
Subsidiaries / Brands: Not publicly disclosed
Avoid products/services: Not applicable (primarily government / B2B services)
Evidence:
DHS and ICE intelligence contracts
Refs: USAspending.gov
Alternatives: Not applicable (institutional service)
Impact score: Consumer Reach 1 | Revenue Sensitivity 1 | Political Leverage 5
👁️ CLEARVIEW AI
Parent company: Clearview AI
Subsidiaries / Brands: Not publicly disclosed
Avoid products/services: Not applicable (law‑enforcement surveillance tools)
Evidence:
ICE and law‑enforcement surveillance use
Refs: DOJ; reporting
Alternatives: Not applicable (institutional service)
Impact score: Consumer Reach 1 | Revenue Sensitivity 1 | Political Leverage 4
✈️ CSI AVIATION
Parent company: CSI Aviation, Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Not publicly disclosed
Avoid products/services: Not applicable (government deportation logistics)
Evidence:
ICE air transport contracts
Refs: ICE contracts; ACLU
Alternatives: Not applicable (institutional service)
Impact score: Consumer Reach 1 | Revenue Sensitivity 1 | Political Leverage 4
🗂️ FORENSIC LOGIC
Parent company: Forensic Logic, Inc.
Subsidiaries / Brands: Not publicly disclosed
Avoid products/services: Not applicable (law‑enforcement data services)
Evidence:
ICE investigative support
Refs: DHS records
Alternatives: Not applicable (institutional service)
Impact score: Consumer Reach 1 | Revenue Sensitivity 1 | Political Leverage 4
📌 LEGAL DEFENSIBILITY APPENDIX
Nature of the Claims
The guide makes descriptive and analytical statements only, including:
Documented political spending, lobbying activity, or government contracting
Publicly reported corporate actions or business relationships
Analytical estimates of consumer reach, revenue sensitivity, and political leverage
The guide does not make claims of illegality, corruption, conspiracy, or malicious intent.
Impact Scores Disclaimer
Impact scores (Consumer Reach, Revenue Sensitivity, Political Leverage) are analytical estimates, not factual assertions.
They are based on:
Public usage data and market share
Revenue mix disclosed in SEC filings or credible reporting
Political spending and lobbying disclosures
Scores are intended solely to assess boycott leverage, not moral culpability or legal responsibility.
Evidence Standards
All evidence cited meets at least one of the following criteria:
Official public records (FEC, OpenSecrets, USAspending.gov, SEC filings)
Court records or settlement documents
Reputable investigative journalism or watchdog reporting
Where data is incomplete or unavailable, this is explicitly stated (e.g., “Not publicly disclosed”).
No anonymous sources or unverifiable claims are relied upon.
Normalization and Transparency
To ensure clarity and fairness, all company entries use a standardized set of fields.
Where a field is not applicable or not publicly documented, this is explicitly labeled (e.g., “Not applicable” or “Not publicly disclosed”).
This approach avoids:
Implied omissions
False equivalence between consumer brands and institutional contractors
Speculative or inferred claims
Distinction Between Consumer and Institutional Targets
Some entities listed (e.g., government contractors or surveillance firms) do not sell products directly to consumers.
Their inclusion reflects:
Structural political influence
Reliance on public funding
Relevance to institutional pressure campaigns
In these cases, the guide does not suggest individual consumer responsibility, and “Alternatives” are labeled as not applicable.
Non‑Discrimination and Non‑Harassment Statement
This guide does not endorse:
Harassment of workers or customers
Vandalism, threats, or coercion
Discrimination based on protected characteristics
Advocacy actions are intended to be peaceful, lawful, and focused on corporate decision‑makers.
Right to Disagreement
Inclusion in this guide does not imply universal consensus.
Readers, organizations, and companies may reasonably dispute:
Impact score weighting
Strategic value of boycotts
Political interpretations
Such disagreement is part of legitimate public discourse.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse